Renaming sender vars in the command system to more proper names.

This commit is contained in:
Olof Larsson
2013-04-25 07:29:19 +02:00
parent 882bdf4c88
commit e32a741b3b
36 changed files with 200 additions and 200 deletions

View File

@@ -39,40 +39,40 @@ public abstract class CmdFactionsRelationAbstract extends FCommand
// Verify
if (otherFaction == myFaction)
if (otherFaction == usenderFaction)
{
msg("<b>Nope! You can't declare a relation to yourself :)");
return;
}
if (myFaction.getRelationWish(otherFaction) == newRelation)
if (usenderFaction.getRelationWish(otherFaction) == newRelation)
{
msg("<b>You already have that relation wish set with %s.", otherFaction.getName());
return;
}
// Event
FactionsEventRelationChange event = new FactionsEventRelationChange(sender, myFaction, otherFaction, newRelation);
FactionsEventRelationChange event = new FactionsEventRelationChange(sender, usenderFaction, otherFaction, newRelation);
event.run();
if (event.isCancelled()) return;
newRelation = event.getNewRelation();
// try to set the new relation
myFaction.setRelationWish(otherFaction, newRelation);
Rel currentRelation = myFaction.getRelationTo(otherFaction, true);
usenderFaction.setRelationWish(otherFaction, newRelation);
Rel currentRelation = usenderFaction.getRelationTo(otherFaction, true);
// if the relation change was successful
if (newRelation == currentRelation)
{
otherFaction.msg("%s<i> is now %s.", myFaction.describeTo(otherFaction, true), newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
myFaction.msg("%s<i> is now %s.", otherFaction.describeTo(myFaction, true), newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
otherFaction.msg("%s<i> is now %s.", usenderFaction.describeTo(otherFaction, true), newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
usenderFaction.msg("%s<i> is now %s.", otherFaction.describeTo(usenderFaction, true), newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
}
// inform the other faction of your request
else
{
otherFaction.msg("%s<i> wishes to be %s.", myFaction.describeTo(otherFaction, true), newRelation.getColor()+newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
otherFaction.msg("<i>Type <c>/"+ConfServer.baseCommandAliases.get(0)+" "+newRelation+" "+myFaction.getName()+"<i> to accept.");
myFaction.msg("%s<i> were informed that you wish to be %s<i>.", otherFaction.describeTo(myFaction, true), newRelation.getColor()+newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
otherFaction.msg("%s<i> wishes to be %s.", usenderFaction.describeTo(otherFaction, true), newRelation.getColor()+newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
otherFaction.msg("<i>Type <c>/"+ConfServer.baseCommandAliases.get(0)+" "+newRelation+" "+usenderFaction.getName()+"<i> to accept.");
usenderFaction.msg("%s<i> were informed that you wish to be %s<i>.", otherFaction.describeTo(usenderFaction, true), newRelation.getColor()+newRelation.getDescFactionOne());
}
// TODO: The ally case should work!!
@@ -80,13 +80,13 @@ public abstract class CmdFactionsRelationAbstract extends FCommand
if ( newRelation != Rel.TRUCE && otherFaction.getFlag(FFlag.PEACEFUL))
{
otherFaction.msg("<i>This will have no effect while your faction is peaceful.");
myFaction.msg("<i>This will have no effect while their faction is peaceful.");
usenderFaction.msg("<i>This will have no effect while their faction is peaceful.");
}
if ( newRelation != Rel.TRUCE && myFaction.getFlag(FFlag.PEACEFUL))
if ( newRelation != Rel.TRUCE && usenderFaction.getFlag(FFlag.PEACEFUL))
{
otherFaction.msg("<i>This will have no effect while their faction is peaceful.");
myFaction.msg("<i>This will have no effect while your faction is peaceful.");
usenderFaction.msg("<i>This will have no effect while your faction is peaceful.");
}
}
}